Ambassador social reputation and peer review

One of the problems facing the Ambassador program is being able to easily understand who is working and the relative quality of their contribution. There have been several ambassadors that were accepted into the program who have not really been active or contributed much, and we need a transparent and fair way to identify that so that corrective action can be taken.

For the spring/summer of 2023 we have created a prototype peer-review process, which is being tested, but there have also been discussions in chats between Ambassadors; this topic is a place to have the conversation publicly.

Linking comments from bylaws thread that are relevant to scoring:

Hello, I agree that requirements should be established to determine whether an Ambassador is active or not, how long they can be inactive, and whether they should be removed from the program or not